对抗机器学习——Fast gradient Sign Method的实践

短命女 2023-08-17 15:42 51阅读 0赞

上文 【[对抗机器学习——FGSM经典论文 EXPLAINING AND HARNESSING ADVERSARIAL EXAMPLES][FGSM_ EXPLAINING AND HARNESSING ADVERSARIAL EXAMPLES]】在理论层面介绍了Fast gradient Sign Method 是如何寻找对抗样本的。它的核心思想是假设神经网络最后的目标函数 J ( θ , x , y ) J(\\theta,x,y) J(θ,x,y)与 输入x 直接存在着近似的线性关系，然后在  L ∞ ( x , x + δ ) < ϵ L\_\{\\infty\}(x,x+\\delta)<\\epsilon L∞(x,x\+δ)<ϵ约束下，让  x x x 沿着 梯度方向 ∇ x J ( θ , x , y ) \\nabla\_\{x\} J(\\theta,x,y) ∇xJ(θ,x,y) 增加，使得目标损失函数变大。  
本文就来实操一下这个FSGM方法。  
Tensorflow已经出了官方的对抗机器学习库 [cleverhans][] 。这个库里面集成了目前学术界提出的大部分对抗方法和防御方法。

# cleverhans安装方法 #

cleverhans是基于Tensorflow的，因此安装它之前必须得安装tensorflow。

为了方便修改cleverhans的代码，便于观察中间结果，免去权限管理能麻烦问题，我们可以把代码下载到本地，然后修改PYTHONPATH环境变量，让python直接使用我们定制的代码。

wget https://github.com/tensorflow/cleverhans/archive/v.3.0.1.tar.gz
    tar -xvf v.3.0.1.tar.gz

假设解压后cleverhans所在的目录为x/cleverhans-3.0.1，那么修改环境变量：

export PYTHONPATH=x/cleverhans-3.0.1:PYTHONPATH

代码：

""" This tutorial shows how to generate adversarial examples using FGSM and train a model using adversarial training with TensorFlow. It is very similar to mnist_tutorial_keras_tf.py, which does the same thing but with a dependence on keras. The original paper can be found at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572 """
    from __future__ import absolute_import
    from __future__ import division
    from __future__ import print_function
    from __future__ import unicode_literals
    
    import logging
    import numpy as np
    import tensorflow as tf
    from tensorflow.python.platform import flags
    
    from cleverhans.loss import CrossEntropy
    from cleverhans.dataset import MNIST
    from cleverhans.utils_tf import model_eval
    from cleverhans.train import train
    from cleverhans.attacks import FastGradientMethod
    from cleverhans.utils import AccuracyReport, set_log_level
    from cleverhans_tutorials.tutorial_models import ModelBasicCNN
    
    FLAGS = flags.FLAGS
    
    NB_EPOCHS = 6
    BATCH_SIZE = 128
    LEARNING_RATE = 0.001
    CLEAN_TRAIN = True
    BACKPROP_THROUGH_ATTACK = False
    NB_FILTERS = 64
    
    
    def mnist_tutorial(train_start=0, train_end=60000, test_start=0,
                       test_end=10000, nb_epochs=NB_EPOCHS, batch_size=BATCH_SIZE,
                       learning_rate=LEARNING_RATE,
                       clean_train=CLEAN_TRAIN,
                       testing=False,
                       backprop_through_attack=BACKPROP_THROUGH_ATTACK,
                       nb_filters=NB_FILTERS, num_threads=None,
                       label_smoothing=0.1):
      """ MNIST cleverhans tutorial :param train_start: index of first training set example :param train_end: index of last training set example :param test_start: index of first test set example :param test_end: index of last test set example :param nb_epochs: number of epochs to train model :param batch_size: size of training batches :param learning_rate: learning rate for training :param clean_train: perform normal training on clean examples only before performing adversarial training. :param testing: if true, complete an AccuracyReport for unit tests to verify that performance is adequate :param backprop_through_attack: If True, backprop through adversarial example construction process during adversarial training. :param label_smoothing: float, amount of label smoothing for cross entropy :return: an AccuracyReport object """
    
      # Object used to keep track of (and return) key accuracies
      report = AccuracyReport()
    
      # Set TF random seed to improve reproducibility
      tf.set_random_seed(1234)
    
      # Set logging level to see debug information
      set_log_level(logging.DEBUG)
    
      # Create TF session
      if num_threads:
        config_args = dict(intra_op_parallelism_threads=1)
      else:
        config_args = { }
      sess = tf.Session(config=tf.ConfigProto(**config_args))
    
      # Get MNIST data
      mnist = MNIST(train_start=train_start, train_end=train_end,
                    test_start=test_start, test_end=test_end)
      x_train, y_train = mnist.get_set('train')
      x_test, y_test = mnist.get_set('test')
    
      # Use Image Parameters
      img_rows, img_cols, nchannels = x_train.shape[1:4]
      nb_classes = y_train.shape[1]
    
      # Define input TF placeholder
      x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(None, img_rows, img_cols,
                                            nchannels))
      y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(None, nb_classes))
    
      # Train an MNIST model
      train_params = { 
          'nb_epochs': nb_epochs,
          'batch_size': batch_size,
          'learning_rate': learning_rate
      }
      eval_params = { 'batch_size': batch_size}
      fgsm_params = { 
          'eps': 0.2,
          'clip_min': 0.,
          'clip_max': 1.
      }
      rng = np.random.RandomState([2017, 8, 30])
    
      def do_eval(preds, x_set, y_set, report_key, is_adv=None):
        if is_adv==True:
            acc = model_eval(sess, x, y, preds, x_set, y_set, args=eval_params,debug=True)
        elif is_adv==False:
            acc = model_eval(sess, x, y, preds, x_set, y_set, args=eval_params)
        setattr(report, report_key, acc)
        if is_adv is None:
          report_text = None
        elif is_adv:
          report_text = 'adversarial'
        else:
          report_text = 'legitimate'
        if report_text:
          print('Test accuracy on %s examples: %0.4f' % (report_text, acc))
    
      if clean_train:
        model = ModelBasicCNN('model1', nb_classes, nb_filters)
        preds = model.get_logits(x)
        loss = CrossEntropy(model, smoothing=label_smoothing)
    
        def evaluate():
          do_eval(preds, x_test, y_test, 'clean_train_clean_eval', False)
    
        train(sess, loss, x_train, y_train, evaluate=evaluate,
              args=train_params, rng=rng, var_list=model.get_params())
    
        # Calculate training error
        if testing:
          do_eval(preds, x_train, y_train, 'train_clean_train_clean_eval')
    
        # Initialize the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) attack object and
        # graph
        fgsm = FastGradientMethod(model, sess=sess)
        adv_x = fgsm.generate(x, **fgsm_params)
        preds_adv = model.get_logits(adv_x)
        # Evaluate the accuracy of the MNIST model on adversarial examples
        do_eval(preds_adv, x_test, y_test, 'clean_train_adv_eval', True)
        # Calculate training error
        if testing:
          do_eval(preds_adv, x_train, y_train, 'train_clean_train_adv_eval')
      return report
    
    
    def main(argv=None):
      from cleverhans_tutorials import check_installation
      check_installation(__file__)
    
      mnist_tutorial(nb_epochs=FLAGS.nb_epochs, batch_size=FLAGS.batch_size,
                     learning_rate=FLAGS.learning_rate,
                     clean_train=FLAGS.clean_train,
                     backprop_through_attack=FLAGS.backprop_through_attack,
                     nb_filters=FLAGS.nb_filters)
    
    
    if __name__ == '__main__':
      flags.DEFINE_integer('nb_filters', NB_FILTERS,
                           'Model size multiplier')
      flags.DEFINE_integer('nb_epochs', NB_EPOCHS,
                           'Number of epochs to train model')
      flags.DEFINE_integer('batch_size', BATCH_SIZE,
                           'Size of training batches')
      flags.DEFINE_float('learning_rate', LEARNING_RATE,
                         'Learning rate for training')
      flags.DEFINE_bool('clean_train', CLEAN_TRAIN, 'Train on clean examples')
      flags.DEFINE_bool('backprop_through_attack', BACKPROP_THROUGH_ATTACK,
                        ('If True, backprop through adversarial example '
                         'construction process during adversarial training'))
    
      tf.app.run()

跑这个代码就完事啦。

以下是一些对抗结果：

<table> 
 <thead> 
  <tr> 
   <th><span><span><span> ϵ \epsilon </span><span><span><span style="height: 0.43056em; vertical-align: 0em;"></span><span>ϵ</span></span></span></span></span></th> 
   <th>攻击成功率</th> 
  </tr> 
 </thead> 
 <tbody> 
  <tr> 
   <td>0.4</td> 
   <td>97.5%</td> 
  </tr> 
  <tr> 
   <td>0.3</td> 
   <td>91.2%</td> 
  </tr> 
  <tr> 
   <td>0.2</td> 
   <td>66%</td> 
  </tr> 
  <tr> 
   <td>0.1</td> 
   <td>23%</td> 
  </tr> 
  <tr> 
   <td>0.08</td> 
   <td>8%</td> 
  </tr> 
  <tr> 
   <td>0.06</td> 
   <td>5.1%</td> 
  </tr> 
 </tbody> 
</table>

一些对抗样本的logit：  
realy: \[0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0\]  
predict: \[0.21056737, -0.13243113, 0.51316774, 0.51515293, -0.22385997, -0.36223292, -0.28980073, -0.61583054, 0.5446904, -0.14677687\]

realy: \[0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0\]  
predict: \[0.0622759, -0.15177919, 0.28638932, 0.48950654, -0.22479388, 0.34589207, -0.0262568, -0.24448192, 0.38647628, 0.0044806357\]

realy: \[0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0\]  
predict: \[-0.048175618, -0.29588905, 0.6424468, 0.2426339, -0.08349679, -0.25063646, -0.2635439, -0.39338973, 0.80821, 0.10917343\]

其实看这些输出，并没有出现对抗里面错误标签的置信度特别高的现象，因此论文里面提到的置信度这么高可能只是个恰合。

[FGSM_ EXPLAINING AND HARNESSING ADVERSARIAL EXAMPLES]: https://blog.csdn.net/jmh1996/article/details/101429073
[cleverhans]: https://github.com/tensorflow/cleverhans/tree/v.3.0.1